Thursday, May 14, 2009

ijCSCL Issue for September 2009

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL)
Volume 4, Number 3, September 2009
Intro
Gerry Stahl * Friedrich Hesse

Time is precious: Variable- and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research
Peter Reimann (Australia)

Distinguishing knowledge sharing, knowledge construction, and knowledge creation discourses
Jan van Aalst (China)

A three-level analysis of collaborative learning in dual interaction spaces
Jacques Lonchamp (France)

Collaborative corrections with spelling control: Digital resources and peer assistance
Asta Cekaite (Sweden)

Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education
Nina Bonderup Dohn (Denmark)

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Practice Perspectives in CSCL

Practice Perspectives in CSCL:
from the introduction to the June 2009 issue of ijCSCL
Gerry Stahl * Friedrich Hesse

The theme of this year’s CSCL conference is “CSCL Practices.” It is concerned with practices relating to technology-based collaborative learning. According to the conference call, the CSCL community is not only concerned with studying and designing effective tools to support CSCL practices, but also with identifying specific educational and professional practices that are associated with their appropriate usages. In order to study practices in a reflective way, powerful theories and analytical approaches are required. The aim of CSCL research is to understand how learning emerges: on an individual level, on a group-cognition level, and at the community level. The articles in this issue of ijCSCL address this goal in specific ways.

The concept of practice is a complicated one. It comes from the Greek praxis—which may be why we are going to Rhodes this year, to connect to our philosophic roots—in contrast to theoria. Modern practice perspectives since Marx (1845/1967) argue for a unity of theory and practice. In common parlance, practice just refers to the things we do. Methodologically, practice indicates that we should be paying attention in our research to the ways in which people actually interact with one another, predominantly in dyads and small groups. According to Schatzki, Knorr Cetina, and Savigny (2001), for some researchers there has been a “practice turn” in contemporary theory, in which analytic focus has shifted from explicit knowledge and social structures to “practices as embodied, materially mediated arrays of human activity centrally organized around shared practical understanding” (p. 2).

The nascent CSCL field was influenced by Lave & Wenger’s (1991) analysis of collaborative learning as social practices within communities of practice. A related inspiration, Scardamalia and Bereiter’s (1996) proposal of CSCL technologies like their CSILE system, suggested introducing some of the practices of scientific research communities into classrooms as fledgling knowledge-building communities. As we shall see in this issue’s articles, the practice perspective can be applied at the individual and group levels of description as well as at the community one. We shall also see investigations of how practices are embodied, mediated and shared within CSCL settings.

The proposal to adopt practice perspectives in CSCL is a substantive one. It contrasts starkly with the view of collaborative learning in terms of observing regularities based on pre-defined and controlled variables of interaction. While a regularity view of causation offers causal descriptions involving sets of manipulated variables, it is less suited to address finer explanations of how observed patterns of interaction unfold over time (Shadish, Cook, and Campbell 2002). Providing such explanations is the field where the study of practice comes into play. Practices are not commonly described in terms of regularity among controlled variables, nor are they usually measured with computations of statistical variance. This does not mean that studies from practice perspectives cannot include quantitative measurements, hypotheses for investigation, specific research questions, rigorous analyses, and scientific results. Rather, the criteria for the most appropriate methods of research, analysis and reporting may be quite different from those for research efforts predicated upon statistical regularities among identifiable variables. For instance, contrast the studies in this issue with Kapur and Kinzer (2009) and Rummel, Spada, and Hauser (2009) in the previous issue.

Of course, ijCSCL is committed to publishing major contributions to CSCL from all scholarly perspectives. We plan to publish discussions of these methodological differences, their rationale and the possibilities for integration in future issues of the journal. At the CSCL 2009 conference, ijCSCL will sponsor a symposium on theory and practice approaches. In this issue, we present a set of papers analyzing the role of practices in CSCL.

ijCSCL issue for June 2009

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL)
Volume 4, Number 2, June 2009
Practice perspectives in CSCL
Gerry Stahl * Friedrich Hesse

The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium
Murat Cakir * Alan Zemel * Gerry Stahl

Affordances revisited: Articulating a Merleau-Pontian view
Nina Bonderup Dohn

Genre and CSCL: The form and rhetoric of the online posting
Norm Friesen

Exploring metaskills of knowledge-creating inquiry in higher education
Hanni Muukkonen * Minna Lakkala

A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning
Kai Hakkarainen

Sunday, February 01, 2009

CSCL 2009 pre-conference workshops, tutorials, seminars

The following workshops, tutorials and seminars will take place on Monday, June 8, and Tuesday, June 9, from 9.30-13.00 and 15.00-18.30. Go to the conference website (http://isls.org/cscl2009/) for descriptions of the events. Note that some events require people interested in participating to contact the event organizer, as stated in the event description.

Monday
tutorial: “Introduction to CSCL -- by the ijCSCL Editorial Board
morning seminar: “Constructing Graphical and Hypertext Knowledge Representations for Learning
afternoon seminar: “Scratch: Creating and Sharing Interactive Media
workshop: “Common Objects for Productive Multivocality in Analysis
workshop: “CSCL Argumentation Systems
workshop: “Intelligent and Innovative Support of Collaborative Learning Activities
workshop: “Adapting Activities Modeled by CSCL Scripts

Tuesday
tutorial: “Collecting and Analyzing Gaze Data from Collaborative Interaction
morning tutorial: “Handling Multi-level Data
afternoon seminar: “E-discussion Moderation with Argunaut
seminar: “Modeling, Creating and Enacting Online Collaborative Scripts
workshop: “Scripted vs. Free CS Collaboration
workshop: “Using Video to Study Learner Practice
workshop: “Improvisational Uses of Group Scribbles and other CSCL Tools
workshop: “Interaction Analysis and Visualization

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Yes We Can

CSCL in a more global context

The world has changed and the opportunities for CSCL have been transformed along with it. I am writing this in early November, immediately after the election of Barack Obama in the US and during a period of unprecedented economic volatility around the globe.

The recent events dramatically accentuate the rapid globalization of all aspects of life. In the US, we change from a parochial culture oriented toward America’s rural past to a government led by someone with personal roots in Africa and Asia and with a respect for ideas and collaboration. The economic crisis forces nations around the world to work together in order to pursue their own self-interest in a complexly intertwined and interdependent globe.

The U.S. election—viewed by many as an election of international import—illustrates the importance of an educated population for democracy. Obama’s support came from the most educated regions of the country. His campaign emphasized argumentation and reason over emotion and faith. To follow the election process, one had to comprehend polling, statistics, sampling, and economics. It also helped to be conversant with e-mail, blogging and new computer interface displays. Just as John Dewey emphasized almost a century ago and as people in developing nations have seen repeatedly, education and democracy need to go forward together.

Despite the crushing pressure to address the economy, Obama still maintains his commitment to improving education in America. He wants to support schools, teachers, and instructional technology in order to raise student test scores. This is where CSCL can provide new vision, tools, and approaches. Research in the learning sciences confirms the importance of schools, teachers, technology, and test scores, but demonstrates the need to go beyond these basic infrastructural elements. Students need to be engaged in constructing knowledge—for themselves and with their peers. They need to become involved in the cultures of knowledge building in various subject domains and to become conversant in the related media for expressing their own understandings.

CSCL offers innovative and powerful ways to take advantage of computer technology to provide new forms of learning. Too often, technology is viewed as a way of automating education and reducing costs, without changing the traditional view of education as the transfer of facts from an authoritative source to a relatively passive student’s memory. CSCL proposes new media to support new experiences for students, in which they can interact with other students in structured environments with well-conceived tasks to learn through exploration and discussion.

Although most CSCL systems are still experimental prototypes, once fully developed with all the supports needed for deployment, they could provide effective learning environments to broad audiences of students. In doing so, they would even make it possible for students to collaborate across national borders, preparing them for an ever more global world.

Mature CSCL environments could be disseminated throughout the world, providing access for students inside and outside of schools to rich digital resources in productive interactional settings. The catch is that students, teachers, parents, schools, and politicians all have to transform how they think about education so that they can appreciate and support the profound kinds of learning that can take place in CSCL experiences.

Some countries have begun to commit to constructivist and collaborative learning as appropriate to our global knowledge-building economy. It is up to CSCL researchers to continue to provide persuasive evidence for transforming our educational institutions in this direction. The attempt to promote progressive education has been frustratingly slow since Dewey first called for it. We still need curriculum, technologies, theories, models, documented successes and reproducible interventions.

The US has fallen behind recently, with its policy of “no child left untested.” At this juncture of history, it seems both hopeful and urgent to move in more collaborative directions. Can CSCL researchers make a difference and help education catch up to its historical mission internationally? Yes we can!

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

ijCSCL issue for March 2009

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL)
Volume 4, Number 1, March 2009

Yes we can!
Gerry Stahl

The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies
Diana Laurillard (UK)

Productive failure in CSCL groups
Manu Kapur (Singapore) * Charles Kinzer (US)

A connective ethnography of peer knowledge sharing and diffusion in a tween virtual world
Deborah Fields * Yasmin Kafai (US)

Learning to collaborate while being scripted or by observing a model
Nikol Rummel * Hans Spada * Sabine Hauser (Germany)

The power of natural frameworks: Technology and the question of agency in CSCL settings
Annika Lantz-Andersson (Sweden)

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Using CSCL tools to build the CSCL & ISLS community

The new president of ISLS, Prof. Marcia Linn, is spearheading an effort to build the community of CSCL and learning sciences researchers between conferences through the use of CSCL tools.

ISLS is the International Society of the Learning Sciences. It was organized to sponsor and support the CSCL and ICLS conference series and the two related journals, ijCSCL and JLS (Journal of the Learning Sciences). Membership in ISLS is included in registration at the CSCL and ICLS conferences, or through http://isls.org.

We are interested in ideas, technologies and pilot efforts to support the community online. In particular, we are interested in ways to prepare for specific activites at the CSCL conference in Rhodes, Greece, this June. These activities include workshops, tutorials, seminars, panels, doctoral consortium, early career, papers, posters, etc. How can we take advantage of online technologies to support these activities before, during and after the conference?

If you have ideas or suggestions for this effort, either add a response to this posting or email Gerry@GerryStahl.net or MCLinn@berkeley.edu.

* * *

Doug Holton emailed me (because comments were not working on this blog):

I created a learning sciences discussion/announcements group here: http://groups.google.com/group/learning-sciences

And for the open education conference, we used a site called Crowdvine to link together blogs, profiles, pictures, and so forth: http://www.crowdvine.com/home